top of page

Public Health Surveillance & Consent

  • James Dadzie
  • Aug 4
  • 1 min read

Updated: 2 days ago

The use of genetic information as anonymized data is incompatible with the principles of public health practice. Active surveillance does not imply neither does it authorize the formulation of preemptive solutions that cater to the whims of sections of various populations.


The notion that a selection of genes should result in desired human traits, is questionable from an ethical perspective. The dilemmas that need to be addressed are based on a successful development of the fetus in utero.


The use of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) has been applied for various reasons but some clinics adopt ad hoc practices resulting in what can be termed human cloning.

Recent Posts

See All
REACH Detroit

While progressing through this week’s reading about Health Promotion, a very important study came to mind. The study, Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH Detroit), sought to use ev

 
 
 
Less Coercive Methods for Vaccine Uptake

Much of the pushback related to vaccine refusal has been due to a lack of parents accessing the right information about vaccines (Dempsey et al., 2006; Nagras 2015). There have been arguments made ag

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page